For Christmas I got a fascinating gift from a good friend - my extremely own “very popular” book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies” (fantastic title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me provided by my friend Janet.

It’s an intriguing read, and really amusing in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and online-learning-initiative.org a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of composing, but it’s also a bit repeated, and very verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet’s prompts in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin “as a leading innovation journalist ...” - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There’s also a mystical, repeated hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no family pets). And there’s a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had sold around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, because pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language model.

I’m not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can’t - just Janet, who developed it, can order any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone creating one in any person’s name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and designed “entirely to bring humour and happiness”.

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, disgaeawiki.info but Mr Mashiach worries that the item is planned as a “customised gag present”, and pl.velo.wiki the books do not get sold further.

He hopes to widen his range, producing various categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It’s developed to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - selling AI-generated items to .

It’s likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we actually mean human creators’ life works,” states Ed Newton Rex, funsilo.date founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to respect creators’ rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is images. It’s masterpieces. It’s records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that.“

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn’t stop the track’s creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think the usage of generative AI for imaginative functions should be prohibited, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people’s work without consent must be prohibited,” Mr Newton Rex adds. “AI can be really powerful however let’s build it morally and fairly.“

OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China’s DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America’s swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have chosen to block AI designers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have chosen to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to use creators’ material on the web to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as “insanity”.

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the incomes of the nation’s creatives,” he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise highly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of happiness,” says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its best carrying out markets on the vague guarantee of growth.“

A government representative said: “No relocation will be made till we are definitely confident we have a useful plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for right holders to help them accredit their material, access to high-quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI designers.“

Under the UK federal government’s brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide data library containing public data from a broad variety of sources will likewise be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump’s return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the security of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector required to share information of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is stated to want the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits versus AI firms, visualchemy.gallery and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under “fair usage” and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of factors which can constitute fair usage - it’s not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training data and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn’t all enough to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple’s US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a fraction of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American’s existing dominance of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I truly want a “bestseller” I’ll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for demo.qkseo.in Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has plenty of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to check out in parts since it’s so verbose.

But given how quickly the tech is evolving, I’m not exactly sure how long I can stay confident that my considerably slower human writing and editing skills, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in global technology, with analysis from BBC reporters around the globe.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.