Usunięcie strony wiki 'OpenAI has Little Legal Recourse against DeepSeek, Tech Law Experts Say' nie może zostać cofnięte. Kontynuować?
1
OpenAI has Little Legal Recourse against DeepSeek, Tech Law Experts Say
Adam Tjalkabota edytuje tę stronę 1 tydzień temu
OpenAI and the White House have implicated DeepSeek of using ChatGPT to inexpensively train its brand-new chatbot.
- Experts in tech law say OpenAI has little option under copyright and contract law.
- OpenAI’s regards to usage might use but are largely unenforceable, they state.
This week, OpenAI and the White House accused DeepSeek of something akin to theft.
In a flurry of press declarations, they said the Chinese upstart had bombarded OpenAI’s chatbots with queries and hoovered up the resulting information trove to rapidly and inexpensively train a design that’s now practically as good.
The Trump administration’s top AI czar said this training process, called “distilling,” amounted to intellectual property theft. OpenAI, on the other hand, informed Business Insider and other outlets that it’s examining whether “DeepSeek might have inappropriately distilled our designs.“
OpenAI is not stating whether the to pursue legal action, instead guaranteeing what a representative termed “aggressive, proactive countermeasures to safeguard our technology.“
But could it? Could it take legal action against DeepSeek on “you took our content” grounds, [loft.awardspace.info](http://loft.awardspace.info/smf/index.php?PHPSESSID=4b71a13aa5185ffbd0e320c10f0f1fc1&action=profile
Usuń stronę