OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) - Elon Musk’s attorneys took on with OpenAI in court Tuesday as a federal judge weighed the billionaire’s demand for a court order that would obstruct the ChatGPT maker from transforming itself to a for-profit business.

U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said it was a “stretch” for Musk to claim he will be irreparably hurt if she doesn’t step in to stop OpenAI from moving forward with its transition from a not-for-profit research laboratory to a for-profit corporation.

But the judge likewise raised concerns about OpenAI and qoocle.com its relationship with organization partner Microsoft and said she wouldn’t stop the case from transferring to trial as soon as next year so a jury can choose.

"It is possible that what Mr. Musk is saying holds true. We ´ ll learn. He ´ ll sit on the stand,” she said.

Musk, an early OpenAI investor and board member, took legal action against the expert system business last year, initially in a California state court and later in federal court, declaring it had betrayed its starting aims as a not-for-profit research laboratory benefiting the general public excellent. Musk had invested about $45 million in the start-up from its founding till 2018, his lawyer said Tuesday.

Musk escalated the legal dispute late in 2015, adding new claims and defendants and asking for a court order that would stop OpenAI ´ s prepares to transform itself into a for-profit organization more fully. Musk likewise included his own AI business, xAI, as a plaintiff.

Also targeted by Musk’s claim is OpenAI’s close business partner Microsoft and tech entrepreneur Reid Hoffman, a previous OpenAI board member who also rests on Microsoft’s board.

Gonzalez Rogers said she has a high bar for authorizing the sort of initial injunction that Musk desires however hasn’t yet ruled on the demand. She did state she had “significant concerns” with 2 people connected to Microsoft on OpenAI’s board - Hoffman and wiki-tb-service.com long time Microsoft executive Deanna Templeton, who was a “non-voting observer.“

"So you desire me to believe that she was sitting there listening to all the discussions and not informing anyone? What would the point be for her to sit there and listen to everybody, if not to communicate what she was listening? There would be no point for her to be there, which is why she in fact needs to not exist,” she said.

Hoffman, a co-founder of LinkedIn, has actually been on Microsoft ´ s board given that quickly after the tech giant purchased the job networking site. He stepped down from OpenAI’s board in 2023 to prevent conflicts with his AI start-up, Inflection.

Templeton, who Musk also named as an accused, was included as a non-voting member of OpenAI ´ s board in the consequences of Altman ´ s ouster after Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella sought more stability on the board. But months later on, surgiteams.com she was dropped from the OpenAI board as U.S. antitrust enforcers were expressing issues about such arrangements on corporate boards.

The judge has actually handled a number of tech market cases consisting of Apple’s fight with Epic Games, wiki.vifm.info though she said Tuesday that Musk’s case is “absolutely nothing like” that a person. That case was likewise the last time she gave a preliminary injunction, in 2020, 8 months before the case went to trial.

Then-President Barack Obama appointed Gonzalez Rogers to the federal bench in 2011.

Tuesday’s hearing was initially set for January but was postponed after Musk’s lawyer Marc Toberoff said his home was damaged in the Pacific Palisades wildfire.

Musk, who did not attend the hearing, bphomesteading.com has alleged in the claim that the companies are breaching the regards to his fundamental contributions to the charity. Judge Gonzalez Rogers called it a “stretch” to claim “irreversible damage” to Musk, and called the case “billionaires vs. billionaires.” She questioned why Musk invested 10s of millions in OpenAI without a written contract. Toberoff said it was due to the fact that the relationship in between Altman and Musk at the time was “developed on trust” and the two were really close.

"That is just a great deal of cash” to invest “on a handshake,” the judge said.

OpenAI has said Musk ´ s requested court order would “disable OpenAI ´ s organization"and mission to the of Musk and his own AI business and is based on “far-fetched” legal claims.

At the heart of the dispute is a 2017 internal power struggle at the new start-up that led to Altman becoming OpenAI ´ s CEO

. Emails disclosed by OpenAI reveal Musk had actually also sought to be CEO and grew frustrated after two other OpenAI co-founders said he would hold excessive power as a major investor and president if the start-up prospered in its objective to attain better-than-human AI called artificial general intelligence, or AGI. Musk has long voiced concerns about how innovative kinds of AI could threaten humankind.

Altman ultimately succeeded in becoming CEO and has actually remained so except for townshipmarket.co.za a duration in 2023 when he was fired and then reinstated days later after the board that ousted him was changed.

OpenAI has actually sought to show Musk ´ s early support for the concept of making OpenAI a for-profit organization so it could raise money for the hardware and computer system power that AI needs.

Musk is not the only one difficult OpenAI’s for-profit transition. Facebook and Instagram parent Meta Platforms has asked California’s chief law officer to block it, and the workplace of Delaware’s chief law officer has said it is evaluating the conversion.

It was not clear Tuesday when the case may go to trial. Musk’s legal representatives at first said they would be all set by June after some back-and-forth with the two sides the judge showed it most likely will not be until June 2026 at the earliest, but likely early 2027.

O’Brien reported from Providence, Rhode Island.

-------