Deleting the wiki page 'How is that For Flexibility?' cannot be undone. Continue?
1
How is that For Flexibility?
Abigail Staley edited this page 1 week ago
As everybody is well mindful, the world is still going nuts trying to establish more, newer and much better AI tools. Mainly by tossing absurd amounts of cash at the issue. Many of those billions go towards building inexpensive or free services that operate at a substantial loss. The tech giants that run them all are wanting to draw in as numerous users as possible, so that they can catch the market, and end up being the dominant or just celebration that can use them. It is the classic Silicon Valley playbook. Once supremacy is reached, expect the enshittification to begin.
A likely way to earn back all that money for establishing these LLMs will be by tweaking their outputs to the preference of whoever pays one of the most. An example of what that such tweaking appears like is the rejection of DeepSeek’s R1 to discuss what happened at Tiananmen Square in 1989. That one is certainly politically motivated, but ad-funded services won’t exactly be enjoyable either. In the future, I totally expect to be able to have a frank and honest discussion about the Tiananmen occasions with an American AI representative, however the only one I can pay for will have assumed the personality of Father Christmas who, while holding a can of Coca-Cola, will intersperse the stating of the tragic occasions with a cheerful “Ho ho ho ... Didn’t you know? The vacations are coming!“
Or perhaps that is too improbable. Today, dispite all that money, the most popular service for code completion still has difficulty working with a number of easy words, [users.atw.hu](http://users.atw.hu/samp-info-forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=a17872fe6d1af84e1729640ae9ade480&action=profile
Delete Page